Skip to main content

If Gertrude was the sole ruler....

So, Hamlet obviously didn't end as the majority of the characters were hoping, i.e. they mostly died. Young Fortinbras certainly did well, but he's just about the only one. All of this resulted due to Claudius' grab for the throne. Even with him killing Hamlet Sr., that didn't guarantee him the throne. So, I think that it would be interesting to think about if Gertrude had taken the throne.
    I personally think that it would be absolutely amazing, an it'd at least be better than Claudius. Firstly, if Gertrude had the throne, she'd have forces behind her. She could put all of the men in their places, and Hamlet likely would've felt secure in revealing Claudius' actions to her. She could have prevented many deaths, and Denmark likely would've benefited greatly from a female monarch, especially given the place of women in the Middle Ages. I think that Gertrude would be a phenomenal ruler, and Hamlet undoubtedly would've gone much differently had she assumed the throne.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Mini Wheats

Hello, class! I hope that this finds you well, if it finds you at all, that is. I just wanted to take a moment to give you all a review on our time in this class. No, I will not be discussing course content, but would you honestly expect anything else? I will now proceed to detail some of my favorite moments of our time together. Firstly, remember how crazy we all got fighting over a single word in "Rockabye Baby"? And our dramatic readings were to die for. We had a short-lived panic when we realized we all had different versions of the textbook. We sat around the big table for the first time and bonded over crickets, kelp, and small dogs in Yalta. We bonded even more when a few of the nobler student *hem hem* had some very intelligent things to say about The Princess Diaries . We were all so sad when Walter left for D.C. and so excited/begrudged when he fixed the projector. We fawned over Austin's dance video. Aubrey drank probably a million iced coffees. Dr. Reed, prefe...
3 comments
Read more

"The world is too much with us" is more important now than ever.

"The world is too much with us" centers around how industrialization and consumerism continue to ruin what Nature provides us with. I'm minoring in Environmental Science, so I (presumably) know at least a decent amount about this kind of issue. For many years, the majority of people seemed to hold a primarily biocentric worldview. This means that the world revolves around humans more than anything and our needs are the most important. However, we have thankfully entered a time where people hold a far more ecocentric worldview, meaning that they care primarily about the Earth. This poem is incredibly honest about the issues with people ignoring and even destroying Nature. I'm so unbelievably lucky to be part of the generation that cares so deeply about the environment, and I really think that this poem fits the current political climate quite well.
Post a Comment
Read more

Crickets and Kelp

This week in class, we discussed Kawabata's "The Grasshopper and the Bell Cricket". Last week, we discussed a poem about kelp. In both cases, relationships/people are compared to these mundane creatures. This begs the question: how do you know if you're a cricket or kelp? Essentially, a cricket is something truly special; it's the end all be all person that you've been searching for and are lucky to have. Kelp means you allow someone to take what they want from you, leave, and come back as they please. Basically, kelp=doormat. But, how do you know if you're being treated like this? How do you know when you're a kelp when you think that you've been giving yourself freely but you've really been "being gathered" in a way? And what if you spend all your life thinking you're a cricket but you're actually a grasshopper? Or vice versa? And which would be worse? What if you really are a cricket and you end up with a grasshopper that t...
Post a Comment
Read more