Skip to main content

If Gertrude was the sole ruler....

So, Hamlet obviously didn't end as the majority of the characters were hoping, i.e. they mostly died. Young Fortinbras certainly did well, but he's just about the only one. All of this resulted due to Claudius' grab for the throne. Even with him killing Hamlet Sr., that didn't guarantee him the throne. So, I think that it would be interesting to think about if Gertrude had taken the throne.
    I personally think that it would be absolutely amazing, an it'd at least be better than Claudius. Firstly, if Gertrude had the throne, she'd have forces behind her. She could put all of the men in their places, and Hamlet likely would've felt secure in revealing Claudius' actions to her. She could have prevented many deaths, and Denmark likely would've benefited greatly from a female monarch, especially given the place of women in the Middle Ages. I think that Gertrude would be a phenomenal ruler, and Hamlet undoubtedly would've gone much differently had she assumed the throne.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Jury's Still Out on Aphra Behn

 Between Oroonoko and The Fair Jilt , I'm entirely puzzled by Aphra Behn as an author. In an entirely Swiftian manner, I simply cannot decipher if her writing is meant to be a commentary on unsatisfactory happenings or if she is actually racist and sexist. If you've read my previous blog on Behn, I further explained this situation in relation to The Fair Jilt and the different lenses it can be viewed through. Where Oroonoko is concerned, she could either be explaining the issue of the noble savage concept or genuinely have a type of savior complex by inserting herself into the narrative and humanizing a brutal story. I would be very interested to read different analyses of her works to see if there is an answer hiding in all of this.
Post a Comment
Read more

Hats and Toilet Paper

 As the COVID-19 pandemic rages on, I have been reflecting on the various stages of quarantine throughout the year. Some were focused on baking, some obsessed over new Netflix shows. One thing that is undeniably embarrassing is the stage where people hoarded toilet paper like that would somehow save them. In relation to this, I was thinking about A Journal of the Plague Year by Daniel Defoe. When discussing the scene where the ladies steal the hats, we all laughed at the absurdity of it. Who would steal something so mundane and unnecessary in such a serious situation? Clearly, most of the United States would. I think this is a great example of how easy it is to say how you would react to a situation if you aren't currently in it. People will say things like, "Well, if someone broke into my house I would just x, y, z," when in reality they'd likely hide in a closet. There truly is no way to know how you'll act in a situation until it's happening, and you proba...
Post a Comment
Read more

Swift's Take on 2020 Politics

 Perusing Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels , I was thinking about the various ways in which he utilizes satire to discuss political flaws without being attacked. I genuinely laugh out loud thinking about the kind of content that Swift could have produced during this election cycle and over the past year especially. Swift's style is so unique because everything he produces is such a cosmic joke that you don't understand unless you first can understand that it's a joke. If you take him too seriously, everything makes sense in the way that fictional things make sense. But, if you know it's a joke, it makes sense on such an all-encompassing level. I would love it if he could somehow live again for just enough time to be caught up to speed on everything and write something roasting everything happening today. It would truly make 2020 more bearable. 
Post a Comment
Read more